Showing posts with label Audio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Audio. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 29, 2022

The Gramophone Company - "Bob Crackett Telling Of Scrooge" (1908) - Bransby Williams - Part 2


If you got a chance to listen to Bransby Williams's record "Bob Crackett Telling of Scrooge," I'm sure you think it's interesting!

I don't at all get the odd spelling of Bob Cratchit's last name on the label, but I think it lends even more odd charm to the proceedings!

Bransby doesn't really change his delivery much when portraying Bob rather than Scrooge, but it's interesting to hear the story from Bob's perspective.

It makes sense that Bob tells us what happened at the beginning and end, as he was there. And he fills in the gaps with what Scrooge would have told him over that Christmas bowl of smoking bishop!

And, of course, in keeping with the other Williams records, it's all explained as a dream!


Monday, November 28, 2022

The Gramophone Company - "Bob Crackett Telling Of Scrooge" (1908) - Bransby Williams - Part 1



"Bob Crackett Telling Of Scrooge" (1908)
Bransby Williams
The Gramophone Company

Bransby Williams returns once again with this 1905 Gramophone Monarch Record.

Give it a listen:



Next: A discussion!





Sunday, November 20, 2022

"The Dicken's Christmas Carol" (1962) - Joe Basham - Icon Records




"The Dicken's Christmas Carol" (1962)
Joe Basham
Icon Records

Here's an oddity from 1962, odd punctuation and all:



It's odd, but I love finding obscure little nuggets like this!

I have no idea who Joe Basham was and can't find any info on him. I will says he tries his best to sell it, though!

The song reminds me of some other song that I can't quite put my finger on (I think it's mainly the "Ding! Dong!" part), but the songwriter is Bob Coulter and I don't think I've seen/heard that name before.

The flipside was also written by Bob Coulter and it's also a bit odd:



I keep throwing around the word "odd" here, but what perhaps strike me as oddest is that this is from 1962, per "Billboard" (Note that Icon Records is so obscure that "Billboard" gets their name wrong!):


So, who was this aimed at?

In 1962, it was generally kids that bought 45s and adults that bought LPs, and I don't think this would appeal to either.

If I were a teenager in 1962, I would much prefer this record, also listed as a new release in that same "Billboard" issue:




Ral Donner delivers the goods!



Friday, April 8, 2022

Popeye and Friends - Peter Pan Records (1977) - Part 2


If you got the chance to listen to the Popeye adventure "Deck the Halls," I'm sure you'll agree with my assessment that it's bizarre!

Beyond, that, however, I find the whole thing too juvenile, and that's something I didn't like, even when I was a kid! The "Ebesneezer" name just isn't funny.

I'm a Popeye fan, though, so I do appreciate hearing Jack Mercer in the role, as he's the definitive Popeye voice.

I also think it's funny that Popeye is attempting to be the grammar police, which is a sorely needed touch of wit!

And why is this story named "Deck the Halls" anyway?

For holiday-related Popeye that's more up my alley, here's his 1933 cartoon "Seasin's Greetinks!":




That's early in the Popeye series (only the fourth release) and features Popeye's actual original voice, Billy Costello.

The Peter Pan album says Jack Mercer was the original voice, but would anyone in the intended demographic know who either Jack or Billy was?


Thursday, April 7, 2022

Popeye and Friends - Peter Pan Records (1977) - Part 1


"Deck the Halls" (1977)
Popeye and Friends
Peter Pan Records
Surrogate Scrooge: Ebesneezer Stooge

Here's a bizarre kiddie record spin on "A Christmas Carol" from Peter Pan Records featuring Popeye the Sailor, voiced by his long-time mouthpiece Jack Mercer.

Give it a listen:



Bizarre, right?


Tuesday, March 15, 2022

Mystery Broadcast - Part 3!




We now return to the Mystery Broadcast...

So, what is the deal with this recording of "A Christmas Carol" anyway?

Well, most sources say it's a BBC broadcast from 1931.

There was such a broadcast, but I'm inclined to think this is not it.

For one thing, the cast isn't overly British sounding. The kid voices in particular sound American to me, but why would a British production want American voices in a story that takes place in England?

And "John," the husband of Scrooge's former fiancée, mentions Santa. That doesn't seem British at all!

Also, the quality seems a little too good for a 1931 broadcast. I'm inclined to think this is from a transcription disc rather than a recording of a live broadcast.

There are no credits at all, so no help there. 

If we knew who was portraying Scrooge we'd have something to go on, but it's probably not the actor's real voice, but rather someone using his stock gruff voice.

So, I'm thinking an American transcription from later in the 1930s.

But it's a mystery!

Saturday, March 12, 2022

Mystery Broadcast - Part 2!




If you got the chance to listen to the "Mystery Broadcast" of "A Christmas Carol," I'm sure you'll agree it's a good adaptation!

Right now is as good a time as any to run down the elements from the book that were included and anything that might have been added.

It runs about 40 minutes, so there's plenty of time to include most of what needs to be included.

We start off with some carolers singing "Silent Night" before a jaunty narrator sets the scene with some dialogue right from the book mixed with some new material. 

The opening scene in Scrooge's office contains just about everything we would expect, with the coal business, Fred's visit and (in this case just one) charity solicitor.

Curiously, Scrooge does not make his "surplus population" remark even through the charity guy puts it right over the plate for him to swing at!

After reluctantly giving Bob the day off, the scene changes to Scrooge already in bed when Marley's ghost arrives.

Marley's Ghost gives Scrooge the usual warning and tells him the other three spirits will all come that same night, but only giving the start time (one o'clock) for the first.

The Ghost of Christmas Past shows up on cue and we get a few scenes.

The transition to each scene is accompanied by a kind of siren sound, which is pretty effective.

First is young Ebenezer at school. Fan comes in and interestingly, Ebenezer said he was waiting for her and asks if they're going home. I always got the impression from the book that he was surprised that Fan showed up to take him home.

The schoolmaster gets a couple of lines here for a change!

Next up is Fezziwig's Christmas party, at which the spirit gets in a good dig at how Fezziwig was a kinder master than "the surviving partner of Scrooge and Marley!"

The breakup scene is next and, most intriguing of all, his former fiancĂ©e's name is Alice, just like in the 1951 Alastair Sim movie version! Must be a coincidence, right? 

Unlike that Alice, we do see this one married and her husband is named John here. Alice says she's very happy and says, "To think what I might have been," in an unusually direct reference to her prior betrothal.

Next up is the Ghost of Christmas Present and Scrooge actually asks the spirit to show him some happiness and goodness and love, showing that he's on the way to reformation.

Naturally they stop off at Bob Cratchit's house and Scrooge seems excited to see him. The Cratchits do about everything you'd expect.

They also visit Fred's party where Scrooge and the spirit watch Fred and the guests play the yes or no game, then toast Scrooge.

Before the spirit leaves, he brings Scrooge down an alley to show him Ignorance and Want. It's very unusual for them not to be hiding in the spirit's robe (when they're included at all).

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come then appears and he does talk in this adaptation.

The spirit shows Scrooge the businessmen as expected, but things take an interesting turn when they actually see two women (presumably the charwoman and laundress) helping themselves to Scrooge's possessions rather than having them selling them to Old Joe.

They then go back to the Cratchit house where we learn that Tiny Tim has died. The spirit then shows Scrooge his own grave and Scrooge pleads for mercy.

Since this spirit talks, he confirms that if Scrooge departs from his course, the ends will change. Good to know!

As with many adaptations, things take a wacky turn on Christmas morning!

Scrooge is aware it's Christmas morning, as the spirits all came on Christmas Eve, so he didn't have to ask anyone. 

It's kind of confusing, but apparently a boy who works for the poulterer knocks on Scrooge's door, mistakenly thinking that Scrooge had ordered a turkey. He hadn't, but he does have the boy bring this turkey back, then deliver the prize turkey to the Cratchits. I don't know why they did it this way. 

What's also odd is that the boy says he brought Scrooge the biggest turkey they had, yet he's not talking about the prize turkey!

Next Fred shows up to ask Scrooge one more time if he'll come to dinner. Scrooge agrees to come, then sends Fred to find the charity solicitor after he tells Fred that he plans to surprise Bob at the office the next morning.

An abrupt cut with no siren-type sound effect finds Scrooge and Bob at the office where Scrooge raises Bob's salary and quotes Tiny Tim's famous line.

The carolers start singing "O Come All Ye Faithful" and we're done!

So, a pretty straightforward adaptation with a few little wrinkles to keep it interesting.

As the narrator said, it's a special radio treat!

Friday, March 11, 2022

Mystery Broadcast - Part 1!



We have an interesting adaptation of "A Christmas Carol" to listen to...

It's a radio broadcast that's something of a mystery. It's perhaps the BBC program from December 24, 1931, but perhaps not. Probably not.

But give it a listen:


Next: Let's discuss!

Sunday, February 6, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 4


So, after a reasonably thorough examination of Vanguard Records' adaptation of "A Christmas Carol" from 1958, the question is how does it rate?

I try to look at such questions from a few different perspectives.

First, how does it work strictly from an adaptational standpoint? Does it capture the flavor of the source material? Can you write a book report from it?

I think it does a pretty good job, but it has too many omissions of important events, especially considering it suns for more than 50 minutes.

The past sequence leaves out young boy Scrooge at school and apprentice Scrooge at Fezziwig's, which are vitally important as these sequences teach Scrooge some valuable lessons. And if this version was to be your introduction to the story, you'd be unaware of some iconic scenes. and wouldn't get a good grade on your book report!

I don't really mind all that much that the end sequence is changed a bit, as that happens in a number of versions, but I don't think it's handled well.

So, this adaptation does not meet the book report test! 

This leads to the next question, which is if you're already familiar with the story and don't mind a few changes, is it entertaining to listen to?

I think it is, as it's well-produced and well-acted. I don't think, however that it has any extra oomph to set it apart from the many other versions, especially those with a "star" Scrooge like Lionel Barrymore, Ronald Colman or Lionel Barrymore.

And I always try to think of how an adaptation compares to others from its general time period.

There were a few albums from around the same time as this one, although this is ahead of the crowd, having been released in 1958.

Right away, I think this one is better than the Frank Pettingell version that followed in 1959, but not as good as the Ralph Richardson version from 1960.

The fair fight is between this one and the Bernard Miles version from 1960. This one works better as an adaptation, but the Miles version offers a more varied listening experience.

Bottom line is that I find this recording interesting and worth a listen, but it's not definiivte.

Saturday, February 5, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 3


Now it's time for the inevitable breakdown of the script for Vanguard Records' audio dramatization of "A Christmas Carol" from 1958!

The whole shebang runs a little less than an hour, so there's plenty of time to cover all the major plot points, but as with many versions, it has many curious omissions.

The record starts off with a prologue by Irish radio commentator Ronnie Walsh to set the mood. It doesn't use anything from the original text, but that's OK.

He does say that the story takes place in 1842, so that would be a year before the book was published.

The first scene in Scrooge's office is pretty much as expected, with visits from Fred and, in this case, one charity collector.

Scrooge actually calls Fred by his name here, not just "Nephew," but the bigger change is that the portly gentleman identifies himself as Mr. Goodman, an importer of teas. This makes him a fellow businessman and not a full-time charity collector.

Despite these changes, the script uses a lot of the familiar dialogue from the book, which is never a bad thing!

The biggest difference overall in this first scene is that Scrooge tells Bob Cratchit that he must report to the office on Christmas morning at 9:00 to work for a couple of hours, rather than giving him the whole day off.

Scrooge also instructs Bob to put his gruel on the fire and put his slippers there to warm, which implies that Scrooge's office and living space are in the same building. So, apparently Scrooge is going back there after his dinner and the knocker is on the office door.

Whatever the case, Marley's Ghost arrives and has the usual banter with Scrooge.

By this point, Scrooge is describing a lot of the action as it's happening, putting me in mind of Basil Rathbone's recording from 1942.

The Ghost of Christmas past comes along and only has one vision for Scrooge, which is the breakup scene with his former fiancée, who is named Emma here.


Emma seems like a suitable name to me, with its echoes of Jane Austen and all, but I always wonder why various versions pick the names they add/or change.

As I mentioned, this is the only scene from the past that Scrooge is shown. The spirit does say, "One shadow more," but Scrooge refuses to see it and the spirit does not compel him to see Belle/Emma with her family as in the book.


As far as that goes, it reminds me quite a bit of a similar scene in "Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol," but this record predates the TV special by four years and I wouldn't imagine it was an influence on it.

Unique to the record and very intriguing is that Scrooge asks the spirit if she will return and she answers affirmatively, indicating she will return on the next night.

Indeed, when the next spirit appears, she is also voiced by Siobhan McKenna and Scrooge recognizes her but notes that she now wears a wreath of holly.

So, it's apparently the same spirit now representing the present, although the spirit does not identify herself as the Ghost of Christmas Present (shades of the George C. Scott version!). She does later say she's the "Spirit of Christmas," however.

This makes the introductory exchange between Scrooge and the spirit somewhat awkward, as dialogue is lifted from the book to include the spirit asking Scrooge if he's seen the like of her before, to which Scrooge says he has not. But, he did - last night!

I realize that they want to make as much use of Ms. McKenna as they can, but the script could have used a bit of tweaking.

As in the past, there's only one scene for Scrooge to see and it's the Cratchit family's Christmas dinner.

This is often a highlight of many versions and it's well represented here, taking up about a quarter of the whole thing.

We even get to hear Tiny Tim's song, which in this adaptation is "The First NoĂ«l." 


Tiny Tim's delivery puts me in mind of the way the kids sang "The First Noël" in the 1965 Davey & Goliath special "Christmas Lost and Found" (which is awesome!), but that's probably just me!

One thing to note is that Scrooge has apparently met Bob's family before as he knows about Tiny Tim and remarks that Peter has grown since the last time he saw him.

I do realize that a lot of Scrooge's dialogue is for expository purposes, but I think that any adaptation that shows that Scrooge was already aware of Tiny Tim's condition loses a bit of impact, as Scrooge should already have been a least bit somewhat concerned instead of only becoming concerned when seeing this vision.

Oh, and I think Mrs. Cratchit calls the usually unnamed Cratchit son "Tom" but does not say the name of the other, non-Martha, non-Belinda daughter!

Scrooge does see Ignorance and Want before this spirit departs.

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come appears and calls out "Ebenezer Scrooge!" twice before clamming up and not saying anything else.

I'm thinking they had her call out to Scrooge just so they could say that Siobhan McKenna played all three spirits, but it strikes me as awkward that this spirit refuses to answer Scrooge's questions when it has been established that she/it can talk!

The spirit brings Scrooge directly to the establishment of old Joe and Scrooge actually knows who Joe is! Again, I realize that it's due to Scrooge needing to speak a lot of expository dialogue, but it's interesting.

Odder still is that only the charwoman enters Joe's shop. She calls herself Mrs. Dilber, which we know is the name of the laundress, but whatever. That's not the odd part!

The odd part is that she brings three different bundles, the other two (in addition to her usual bed curtains and whatnot) being the bundles usually brought by the laundress and the undertaker's man. Joe opens each bundle separately and gives an accounting of each one separately, using dialogue from the book.

I don't know why it's done that way instead of having a couple of the actors voice the laundress and undertaker's man, as it's easy enough for voice actors to double up.

Scrooge then says that he wants to see some emotion caused by his death, then some tenderness connected with a death, as he does in the book, but if the spirit does show him these things, we do not partake in them!

We just hear some eerie music and Scrooge saying he has leaned his lesson and doesn't need to see anything else. But the spirit brings Scrooge to a churchyard anyway.

There he sees Tiny Tim's grave as well as his own and notes that Tim's is well cared for and his own is not.

So, Scrooge wakes up on Christmas morning and jumps around and all and engages the boy outside the window to buy the prize turkey and deliver it anonymously to Bob Cratchit and says he'll get in touch with Mr. Goodman to make a charitable donation.

Despite some of the changes that have led to a bit of awkwardness, the script so far has been pretty faithful to the book. But from this point on, things get very clunky!

The problem is that Scrooge had told Bob Cratchit that he needed to work on Christmas morning. So, the business of Scrooge arriving at the office ahead of Bob in order to surprise him takes placed on Christmas morning, rather than the day after.

Usually Bob's excuse for being late is that he was "making rather merry," which is fun. But here he says he was up late helping Mrs. Cratchit prepare the Christmas dinner, which just seems lame.

But Scrooge raises Bob's salary and says he will help his struggling family and that they'll discuss it that afternoon over a Christmas bowl of smoking bishop and all, just like in the book, but that just doesn't make sense that he'd meet with Bob on Christmas afternoon, pulling him away from his family.

So, Scrooge sends Bob home and says he'll see him later in the day.

The tone of the whole thing changes now as the narrator reappears with some jaunty music to tell us the scene is now the Cratchit house after dinner (presumably having eaten the prize turkey) and we hear a little speech from Bob about the new year. Then the narrator (and music) comes back to tell us that Fred and his "winsome wife" have dropped in.

It strikes me as odd to have the narrator return suddenly after having only given the prologue before. Why didn't we have him set some other scenes instead of having Scrooge spout so much expository dialogue?

And what makes Bob and Fred such good friends? It's not particularly established that they know each other well, such as was the case in the 1938 MGM movie version.

Things get so incredibly awkward when Scrooge shows up at the Cratchit house and everyone seems surprised to see him, including Bob. And Bob then acts surprised when Scrooge says he help his family.

Now, keep in mind that Scrooge had already met with Bob earlier that day and raised his salary and said he see him later. Wouldn't Bob had told his family this good news when he got home? You'd think he would mention Scrooge was different (and would be dropping by)! He would at least have to explain why he came right back home rather than needing to work for a couple of hours.

Scrooge also namedrops Fezziwig, saying he knew how to celebrate Christmas, but within the confines of this record, we have no idea who Fezziwig is.

When Bob offers Scrooge "a glass," Scrooge declines, saying he's had enough of spirits to last a lifetime, which is a good line, but everyone laughs uproariously as if they got the joke, but they should not have any idea what he's talking about.

This whole final scene is just very strange and not particularly well-handled.

Scrooge ends the record by using more text from the book and suddenly it's done. Totally cold ending with no music or anything. I think the narrator should have come back with the jaunty music to close it out to give it a little more balance.

OK, so what's the final verdict?

Friday, February 4, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 2



If you got the chance to listen to the 1958 dramatization of "A Christmas Carol" from Vanguard Records, I'm sure you found it interesting.

Before discussing it, just a few words about the cast, which consisted of members of the Dublin Theatre, as per the album cover.



The most prominent name is Irish actress Siobhan McKenna, who portrays the three Christmas spirits and gets her picture on the cover!

I'm reasonably familiar with her, as she was in a few movies, most notably 1965's "Dr. Zhivago" and 1961's "King of Kings," in which she played Mary. She was mainly a stage actress, however, and well-known as such in 1958.

I think she does a good job on the album, but isn't really used that much.




Scrooge is played by Anew McMaster, who was almost exclusively a stage actor, appearing in only one small, un-billed part in one movie, 1960's "Sword of Sherwood Forest," a fun flick featuring Richard Greene's Robin Hood vs. Peter Cushing's Sheriff of Nottingham!

I do think McMaster is a slight bit hammy as Scrooge, perhaps a result of his normally working on the stage, but he does the heavy lifting here and is effective.

I understand that although he styled himself as Irish native, he was actually born in England with the first name of Andrew!



The only other actor from the album that I recognize is Milo O'Shea, who plays old Joe. He wasn't too well-known in 1958, but had a long career lasting into the 2000s in which he popped up in a lot of movies as well as TV dramas and sitcoms.

He had a particularly interesting year in 1968 with featured roles in the movies "Romeo and Juliet" and "Barbarella" (he was Durand-Durand)!

I think its a good cast that performs well!

Next: What kind of a script did that cast get to perform?

Thursday, February 3, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 1



"A Christmas Carol" (1958)
Vanguard Records
Scrooge: Anew McMaster

It seems like forever since I've reviewed a straight-up adaptation of "A Christmas Carol," so here we go with this audio dramatization from Vanguard Records in 1958, featuring Siobhan McKenna with Anew McMaster as Scrooge.

Give it a listen:




Next: A look at the cast...

Monday, September 20, 2021

Creepy!

Here's the odd (and creepy looking) cover to a kids' record from 1978:



Scrooge looks like a zombie that rose out of that grave!

And Tiny Tim appears to have a broken leg. Wouldn't that just heal by next Christmas and he'd be all set?

At least it's very 1970s!

Saturday, September 18, 2021

Royale!

Here's something on which I'd like to get my mitts, or at least be able to hear:



Gotta keep searching!



Monday, July 26, 2021

Other Soundtrack!

Here's the soundtrack album of the 1999 Patrick Stewart TV-movie:



Definitely not the 1984 one - just thought I'd point that out!

Saturday, July 24, 2021

Soundtrack!

This soundtrack album released long after the initial release of the 1984 George C. Scott TV-movie looks intriguing:



Nice cover!

The CD seems to have had a limited pressing in 2017.

Word is that it's really good, but there are a lot of inferior products that confuse the issue.

For example, on Amazon, it looks like there are reviews from other albums mixed in and if you try to steam it, it redirects over to the soundtrack for the 1999 Patrick Stewart TV-movie!

Oh, well!

Thursday, June 17, 2021

"Make That Money (Scrooge's Song)" - Alice Cooper (1982)


"Make That Money (Scrooge's Song)" (1982)
Alice Cooper
Warner Brothers

Also from the not-my-area-of-expertise and as something of a follow-up to yesterday's song, we have Alice Cooper singing about the still-unrepentant Scrooge:


Actually pretty catchy!

I still feel more at home in 1945, though!

Wednesday, June 16, 2021

"Scrooge" - Little Roy (1970)



"Scrooge" (1970)
Little Roy 
Camel

Here's an interesting track from 1970 - Little Roy singing about an apparently unrepentant Scrooge:



I'm not a reggae buff, but I think this has a good groove.

Does that mean it's bad?



Thursday, June 3, 2021

Pierre Tchernia - "Un Conte De Noël" (1973)

"Un Conte De Noël" (1973)
Pierre Tchernia
Vogue Records

We leave the high art world for this interesting looking French record from 1973:



If my high school French still serves me, the title translates to "A Tale of Christmas" in English and it's racontĂ© par (told by) Pierre Tchernia!

I'm not familiar with that gentleman, but he was apparently well-known in Franc over a long career in television and movies.

I'd like to hear the recording to get an idea of the production. and see how well I can follow the story.

Something else to keep an eye (or ear) out for!

Saturday, May 8, 2021

Of Pocket Books and Whatnot...


While thinking about the edition of "A Christmas Carol" published in 1939, I was reminded that one of those stray trivia things it seems like I've always known is that the first Pocket Book to be released was "Lost Horizon" by James Hilton. Haven't had much practical use for that fact until now, I guess!


And, of course, the star of the classic 1937 movie version of "Lost Horizon" was Ronald Colman. It's been a couple of days since I last mentioned Ronald Colman, so there we go!

Here's a nice-looking trailer for a theatrical reissue:



And for even more fun, here's Ronald Colman starring in an adaptation of "Lost Horizon" recorded for Decca Records in 1944:



Interesting to note that this is an adaptation of the book, not the movie per se.

This 78 rpm album was a follow-up Decca's earlier recording of "A Christmas Carol" from 1941. I may have mentioned that one once or twice!

A bit more trivia: the kangaroo's name is Gertrude!