Definitely not the 1984 one - just thought I'd point that out!
Showing posts with label A Christmas Carol (1999). Show all posts
Showing posts with label A Christmas Carol (1999). Show all posts
Monday, July 26, 2021
Saturday, December 19, 2020
"A Christmas Carol" All-Star Team - Day 19
This particular spirit is the one that varies the most from one adaptation to another, due to the hard-to-capture description in the book, which is hard to depict in illustrated form, let alone live-action!
One depiction to me captures the "like a child: yet not so like a child as like an old man, viewed through some supernatural medium" pretty well, though - Joel Grey in the 1999 made-for-TV version starring Patrick Stewart:
I think Joel Grey has always had a child-like quality anyway and with his age at the time (67) and some special effects, he nails it!
But that's a whole 'nother story!
Friday, December 20, 2019
A Christmas Carol (1999) - Part 5
A few more thoughts on the 1999 made-for-TV adaptation of "A Christmas Carol" from 1999...
I think this is a pretty solid version. I don't think it really adds much, but I do appreciate the interesting little touches they add here and there, including some rarely seen details from the book.
I'm always in favor of more adaptations anyway!
It's hard to believe that 20 years have passed since 1999, but I think this holds up pretty well.
Patrick Stewart has a large fan base, so I can see people watching this who are not aficionados of the story watching this. Maybe they've never seen another version before!
They'll get a good representation of the story with agood lead
Who knows, maybe they'll become fans!
Thursday, December 19, 2019
A Christmas Carol (1999) - Part 4
The 1999 TV adaptation of "A Christmas Carol" sticks pretty close to the book, but like any adaptation, it adds a little and subtracts a little. How did they do?
The movie opens with Jacob Marley's funeral procession in 1836. There's no narrator, so Scrooge and some of the other characters have some expository dialogue about Marley being dead as a doornail and such. I think it's a bit awkward. Interestingly, however, Scrooge promises Marley that he'll keep doing what they've been doing. And how!
Scrooge goes back to his office, outside of which is a pretty spiffy "Scrooge and Marley" sign. But it ages a lot! We go inside and Bob Cratchit mentions it's been seven years since Marley died, so shouldn't they change the sign? That went over about as well as expected!
These opening scenes apparently strongly influenced the Jim Carrey computer animated version of ten years later. They're quite similar.
Scrooge and Cratchit argue about coal and such, then Scrooge's nephew Fed sneaks up on Scrooge. After the usual banter, we see Fred out in the street where he runs into the charity solicitors, who ask him where Scrooge and Marley's is, saying they're new to the district. Fred gives them a "you'll be sorry" look.
The gentlemen get the welcome that Fred predicted and Scrooge knows that they must be new. They're given names here, Williams and Foster. Interestingly one of them says there are hundreds of thousands in need. That's not usually specified like that.
After they leave, we see a bunch of carolers and one says he's going to try Scrooge's. The others don't think he should, and they're proven correct when Scrooge goes totally "get off my lawn" on them all!
After begrudgingly giving Bob Cratchit the next day off, Scrooge goes straight home and sees Marley's face in the knocker. Marley screams at him, which is little wacky.
While eating his gruel, he sees little Marley faces in the fireplace tiles. The tiles are biblical scenes and are probably the closest to the description in the book than in any other version.
Marley's Ghost comes in and Scrooge is not overly impressed. He says, "Speak up, man," so the ghost takes off his wrapper and we get a pretty good effect of its jaw dropping. What's weird, though, is that Scrooge goes over and snaps its jaw back into place!
Also curious is that when Marley's Ghost says its own change is "ponderous," which it isn't because we see it. It's Scrooge's chain that's ponderous!
Marley's Ghost does show Scrooge the other phantoms before leaving.
The Ghost of Christmas Past shows up and, as mentioned before, has an odd appearance, sort of young, sort of old.
They go back to Scrooge's school and Scrooge yells out the names of some of the kids. This version's big on assigning random names. I wonder if the names are actual old classmates of Patrick Stewart's or something fun like that.
They see young Ebenezer by himself and Scrooge says that his father turned against him when his mother died. They don't say why, but it doesn't seem to be that the mother died in childbirth.
Then Scrooge's apparently younger sister comes in. Fine, but she's named "Fran!" What? That's horrible! Why, Patrick Stewart, why? You should know better!
Next, they go to Fezziwig's. In an amusing bit, old Scrooge peeks at young Scrooge's ledger and gives an approving nod.
I must say that I don't care for the depiction of Fezziwig and his family here. They're very crass and vulgar and remind me of the Thenardiers from "Les Miserables," which is not a good thing. And they give them a son here, and he has the same hairdo as Fezziwig, but that's supposed to be Welsh wig, so does the son have a junior wig? I don't like this whole sequence one bit!
Scrooge says things look better than they were. Hmmm...
As by now seems the norm, Belle is at Fezziwig's party, so we know who she is before the inevitable breakup. For some reason, however, we don't see Belle married with her family.
When the Ghost of Christmas Present shows up, Scrooge is still not too impressed. He says he wants to get it over and done with. He's a tough nut to crack, but not quite as tough as George C. Scott.
They see people celebrating the holiday as they make their way to Bob Cratchit's house. Martha (who looks young) comes in and talks about working at the shop and Scrooge approvingly says that she sounds like a hard-working girl. Too bad her father doesn't do as good of a job!
They have their rather grim dinner, then Tiny Tim sings "Silent Night."
What's fun is that the song is picked up by the guys in the lighthouse then the sailors, who sing it in German, and so on, to show other celebrations. It's a good way to show what a lot of versions don't.
We then go to Fred's party, which also has a different vibe. The guests spend most of the time raking Scrooge over the coals and not in a jovial manner. They make Fred defend him, which actually makes Fred look better. Topper gets a last name, Haines, here. I think he's more creepy than fun. Fred's wife's sister also gets a name (Betsy) and a couple named the Bennetts are added in.
Before this spirit goes, we do see Ignorance and Want.
The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come appears next and I don't like it at all. It has these weird eyes for some reason. They look like cheap LEDs or something. I don't know what they were going for. Is it supposed to look like a Jawa?
This spirit shows Scrooge a lot of stuff. We get the other businessmen at the Exchange, and the scene at Old Joe's. In addition to Mrs. Dilber, the others get names: Mr. Crump for the undertaker and Mrs. Riggs for the charwoman. Or is she the laundress? Never mind!
After the body on the bed, we get the scene with Caroline and he husband happy that Scrooge died. This is always good to see.
For tenderness connected with a death, we go to the Cratchit's house and Bob goes to the room and we actually do see the recently deceased Tiny Tim! Is that the first time since 1935?
Scrooge then is brought to the graveyard, where he sees his grave. But hen he sees himself in his coffin as he falls in! Yikes! Luckily, he falls into his own bed.
Now, Scrooge is fully reformed and apparently wants to celebrate with a laugh. Well, he chokes one out so violently that the first time you see this show you think he might be having a heart attack. That would not be happy ending!
But, he's OK, and calls to the boy out the window. He has to force himself to offer the boy a shilling, which is a neat touch. The kid is oddly suspicious and demands that shilling!
After dealing with the turkey business, he finds time to shave, as he doesn't have his stubble anymore. He then goes to church, which is another rarely seen detail from the book. Amusingly, he doesn't know that he should remove his hat. It's been a while!
He goes to Fred's and does the polka just like Alastair Sim!
Oddly, he doesn't run into either of the charity solicitors during his Christmas morning rounds.
The next day he surprises Bob at the office the next morning in manner that's very faithful to the book in that Bob really thinks Scrooge might need a strait-waistcoat.
During the epilogue, Fred comes on to narrate as we see Scrooge awaiting the whole Cratchit family, whom he welcomes into his home.
A nice ending, if cribbed somewhat from the George C. Scott version!
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
A Christmas Carol (1999) - Part 3
As expected, Patrick Stewart dominates the proceedings as Scrooge on the 1999 made-for-TV adaptation of "A Christmas Carol."
But he's not doing a one-man show this time, so he needs a supporting cast. What did he get?
Richard E. Grant plays Bob Cratchit. He looks like you'd expect Bob to look. Not overly well-fed. He's pretty somber in the role. He's appropriately subservient to Scrooge at the office, but he doesn't crank up the Christmas spirit all that much with his family. This is perhaps more realistic based on the circumstances, but usually Bob is happy despite the circumstances.
Saskia Reeves as Mrs. Cratchit follows suit. She gives a convincing portrayal, but there's an air of doom hanging over them.
Tiny Tim is played by Ben Tibber, who does look smaller and less healthy than most TTs. He's not focused upon here, however, so he doesn't have much to do.
I think Dominic West is a standout as Scrooge's nephew Fred. He really seems to have a lot of Christmas spirit and is convincing when he defends his uncle to his wife and party guests.
I don't feel that Marley's Ghost, as played by Bernard Lloyd, is as successful. He doesn't seem all that scary and Scrooge really isn't afraid of him.
I do think that Joel Grey does a good job as the Ghost of Christmas Past. He kind of fits the description in the book as he looks sort of like an old man, yet sort of like a child. It's an odd thing, but that's the point.
The Ghost of Christmas Present is played by Desmond Barrit and he's not quite as jovial as might be expected. This whole production is kind of grim. Also, I think this ghost looks tired, even when he first appears.
An interesting note with the cast is that Liz Smith, who plays Mrs. Dilber here, also played Mrs. Dilber in the 1984 TV movie with George C. Scott! I think this time they got it right and she's the laundress, not the charwoman, but who can tell anymore?
Now that the cast is assembled what were they given to do?
Tuesday, December 17, 2019
A Christmas Carol (1999) - Part 2
So, how does Patrick Stewart fare as Scrooge in the 1999 made-for-TV adaptation of "A Christmas Carol?"
He gives an interesting performance. He definitely seems to be taking a page from George C. Scott's book, as he plays Scrooge as a cold, tough businessman rather than an eccentric miser. Not that he's imitating Scott, but it's in that same mold.
A few things made it tough for me to accept him as Scrooge at first. The main thing is that he doesn't have a Scrooge look. He looks the same as he always looks, so when you see him, you think Captain Picard or Professor X or whatever your Patrick Stewart point of reference is. You know he's playing Scrooge, but he doesn't ooze Scrooginess.
I don't understand the shaved head. Why would Scrooge shave his head? That seems anachronistic to me. Is it merely that Stewart doesn't want to appear any other way?
I also think it's odd that he has stubble on his face through much of the movie. Even if Scrooge were to shave his head, why wouldn't he also shave his face?
Patrick Stewart was 59 years old at the time, which seems like a good Scrooge age, but I think he seems younger. He doesn't necessarily look like he's been worn down by the world or that he would die in a Christmas Yet to Come anytime soon.
He also talks like he always talks and doesn't affect a wacky voice.
In any event, as things get going and you get caught up in the story you start thinking he's Scrooge. Maybe that's the sign of a good actor? He's not relying on makeup or other tricks.
He certainly has a commanding presence and holds our attention.
As far as the reclamation of Scrooge goes, he does gradually change. He's convincingly mean at the beginning and convincingly nice at the end, so all in all, a solid job!
Next, we take a look at the rest of the cast...
Monday, December 16, 2019
A Christmas Carol (1999) - Part 1
A Christmas Carol (1999)
Director: David Jones
Scrooge: Patrick Stewart
We jump ahead 40 years and go from Basil Rathbone to Patrick Stewart for another made-for-TV adaptation of "A Christmas Carol."
This version from 1999 is like a full-fledged movie, however, as it runs about 90 minutes, so there's plenty of time to tell the story and include as many incidents as they see fit.
This also seems to have a pretty good budget and was seemingly meant to be shown year after year, so any criticism (or praise) is fair game!
Patrick Stewart had previously done a one-man version of the story, which he also recorded as an audio book, so he's familiar with the material. He's also listed as an executive producer for this movie, so we'll blame him for anything we don't like!
Actually, this is a solid version in the George C. Scott mode. I think that 1984 TV-movie is the modern template.
This version is somewhat dark and grim.
Next up: How Patrick Stewart does as Scrooge...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




























