Monday, February 28, 2022

"An American Christmas Carol" (1979) - Part 5


So, what's the final verdict on "An American Christmas Carol," the 1979 TV-movie starring Henry Winkler?

I think it's pretty good for what it is, but I'm definitely more of a fan of relatively straight adaptations. you know, where it's actually Ebenezer Scrooge, not just a Scroogey character.

I do think it's interesting that Benedict Slade (not a bad name) is familiar with the story of "A Christmas Carol" and he does show more genre savvy (to use that term again) than Frank Cross, Bill Murray's character in 1988's "Scrooged," which "An American Christmas Carol" reminds of most.

There are so many parallels between Slade's and Scrooge's stories, however, that it stretched credibility a bit!

I think Henry Winkler does a good job and his old-age makeup looks pretty good to me, although at this late date, the surprise of seeing the Fonz made up to look old is long gone!

All in all, I'd say it's worth a watch, but I'm not sure if or when I'll watch it again.

I remember seeing it way back when it was new and it took me this long to watch it again. But if I'm still around in another 43 years, I definitely will watch it again!

                                       

Sunday, February 27, 2022

"An American Christmas Carol" (1979) - Part 4


Now let's take a look at the story and plot of the TV-movie "An American Christmas Carol" from 1979!

Since this is not a straight-up adaptation  of "A Christmas Carol," the script by Jerome Coopersmith does not need to be particularly faithful to the source material, but it actually does follow the book fairly closely.

But be aware that there are SPOILERs ahead!

The story takes place in Concord, New Hampshire in 1933, which is right in the middle of the Great Depression, so a lot of the people in town are having hard times and can't afford to make their payments om their various possessions.

It's their further misfortune that the loans are held by Benedict Slade, the Scrooge surrogate, who's so mean that he spends Christmas Eve going around repossessing various items.

The topper is when he repossesses a piano from the orphanage that he himself had once lived at!

This reminds me most of Albert Finney's Scrooge who threatens to confiscate the goods of his debtors, but Slade actually does it!

Along the way, he deals harshly with three specific individuals who will pop up later on.

Most intriguing is Merrivale, who runs a campus bookshop, but has the nerve to sell books rather than sweaters and bow ties!

Slade starts tearing the leather covers off various books, including "A Christmas Carol!" So, the story does exist in this universe!

I think the orphanage piano bit is a little over the top, especially since he seems somewhat sympathetic to the orphans who come by his office to sing Christmas carols. He doesn't chase them away, but rather greets them pleasantly and gives each the the gift of a self-help pamphlet!

Slade is reluctantly assisted in the repos by his employee Thatcher (I didn't catch his first name), who fills the Bob Cratchit role.

Thatcher also sort of serves as one of the charity collectors, as he urges Slade to reopen the local quarry that had closed the previous year in order to stimulate the town's economy.

Slade doesn't take too kindly to business advice from his employee, so he fires Thatcher, à la Reginald Owen's Scrooge firing of Gene Lockhart's Bob Cratchit.

Now, I know it's mean for Slade to fire Thatcher on Christmas Eve, but Thatcher was giving Slade a hard time about the quarry (it's not Slade's fault that it was closed and as Slade points out, why would he want to restart a failed business?) and he was undermining his repo activities, so you can see why Slade was fed up!

In any event, there's no Fred equivalent here, as well as no Fan stand-in.

We do get a Marley, though, as Slade is visited by the ghost of Jack Latham, his late business partner.


Slade had been reading "A Christmas Carol," however, so he's kind of genre savvy and thinks the ghost is an imposter. He mentions that he might be wearing a lot of makeup like "that actor" in "Frankenstein," which had been released in 1931!

But Latham's Ghost gives him the usual special and says more spirits will be forthcoming in a relatively brief scene.

Having read the book, Slade is aware that the next visitor is the Ghost of Christmas Past. What's odd is that it seems to be Merrivale, the book store owner. He doesn't say he's not, but he makes a reference to having played the trumpet in a war and that walls came down. Is he supposed to be Joshua?

And what does he have to do with Slade's past anyway? This reminds me of the random characters doubling as the spirits in the Kelsey Grammer musical version, which was 25 years later.

In the past, we see young Slade at the orphanage from which he's taken in by Mr. Brewster, the Fezziwig stand-in who owns a furniture-making company.

Brewster takes boy Slade to the factory and gives him a pep talk and makes him his apprentice and so on.

Then we see grownup Slade, which is now Henry Winkler without the old-age makeup, but with a 1970s style hairdo, in love with Brewster's daughter Helen and full of ideas about how to streamline the furniture-making process and sell a cheaper product.

But Brewster won't hear of it, so Slade goes to work for another company in Chicago, leaving Helen behind until he can make more money.

He returns to Concord about ten years later and sees Helen running a World War I bond rally.

I must point out that I didn't think it's realistic that Helen sold $25,000 worth of war bonds, as they would be way too much for the 1918-or-so residents of Concord to come up with.

Also this is only about 15 years from the "present" of 1933, but old Slade looks at least 30 years older than young Slade!

Slade again tries to help Brewster, whose business is not doing well, by telling him he could sell furniture to people "on time" so they can make installment payments, but, again, Brewster doesn't want to hear it.


The idea does catch the fancy of Latham, however, who reminds me more of Mr. Jorkin from 1951's "Scrooge" rather than Jacob Marley. Brewster's unwillingness to change with the times also echoes Fezziwig from that film.

Anyway, Brewster's factory burns down and he doesn't have insurance, so he's out of business. Slade feels bad about this, but none of that is his fault. He does not take over the business like Alastair Sim did.

Latham could have loaned money to Brewster to try to rebuild the factory, but he goes into the finance business with Slade instead. Slade correctly points out that loaning to Brewster would be throwing good money after bad, which seems cold.

Brewster winds up dying and Helen is mad at Slade, ending whatever chance their relationship might have had.

Now we're done with the past. I don't really see anything that would have caused Slade to become so Scroogey other than the breakup with Helen, but whatever.

The Ghost of Christmas Present shows up in the person of Mr. Jessup, the head of the orphanage. Why he represents the present is about as clear as why Merrivale represents the past!

Interestingly, the first place they go is Helen's house, where we see she's married (to a pharmacist) and has a grown daughter. This also seems like it wouldn't have all happened within the 15 years, but it's an affecting scene, although the book's equivalent is seven years in the past, not the present.

They next go to Thatcher's house, where we see him with his wife, daughter and son Jonathan, who I guess has polio and is the Tiny Tim character.

The Thatchers are hoping to save enough money to send Jonathan to Australia, so he can be cured by Sister Kenny, whom I know from the 1946 movie starring Rosalind Russell. Of course, with Thatcher not having a job anymore, and Australia being quite far away from New Hampshire, that's a tall order.

Slade is legitimately upset by this, not having known that Thatcher had a sick child.

The Ghost of Christmas Future is up next and he seems to be Matt Reeves, whose furniture had been repossessed by Slade, but, as I mentioned, he wears 1970s clothes and such.

This ghost shows Slade's things being auctioned off in his warehouse. Nobody wants to buy anything except his portrait, which they have a fun time burning.

This obviously takes the place of the scene at Old Joe's establishment and I get that they're going for something along the same lines, but I don't think it works.

First, Slade's things would have some value and/or use to people, especially if they can get something at a low price, Depression and all. Hey, even Scrooge's odds and ends had value!

Also, some of that stuff would be things Slade had repossessed, so this would be a chance for people to get some of it back.

Second, a woman bids $100 for Slade's portrait. $100 is too much for someone to fork over just to burn the thing, whether she hated him or not. And I presume the people that hated him were those who owed him money, so where would she get that kind of dough?


The auctioneer, by the way, is played by Cec Linder, whom I would swear I didn't know. However, he did portray Felix Leiter in 1964's "Goldfinger," which is a good credit. I remember the Felix Leiter character in "Goldfinger" very well and can picture him in my mind's eye, but I could not have told you who played him.

Jack Lord as Felix Leiter in "Dr. No," definitely yes. I could even tell you it was Rik Van Nutter in "Thunderball." But Cec Linder, no.

Anyway, Slade then sees Jonathan Thatcher's grave, then his own and is ready to reform!

He looks out window on Christmas morning and a couple of boys confirm which day it is, but Slade does not send them to get a turkey.

He apparently grabs one along the way, though, as he shows up at the Thatcher house with a big turkey and some presents. The present for Jonathan is a series of tickets that will get him to Australia. The sequence in which Slade describes each ticket is amusing.

Slade then grabs Thatcher and they return all the stuff they had repossessed the day before, finally bringing the piano back to the orphanage, along with some presents for the kids.

Slade notices a boy off by himself who reminds him of himself at that age, so he takes the kid to the burnt out factory and gives the kid the same speech that Mr. Brewster had given him, so I guess it's come full circle.

The thing is, though, that this new kid can't be an apprentice at the furniture factory because there is no factory! The scene makes no sense and goes on way too long. We get the point right away and don't need to be hit over the head!

Slade also told Thatcher that he was going to reopen the quarry and put Thatcher in charge, so happy ending!

You know, I thought I was just going to do a quick recap, and I really don't mean to nitpick, but there you go!

Next: What's the final verdict?

Saturday, February 26, 2022

"An American Christmas Carol" (1979) - Part 3


Now that we've discussed Henry Winkler's role as Benedict Slade in the 1979 TV-movie "An American Christmas Carol," let's take a look at the rest of the cast.

While watching this now, I'm kind of surprised that I hardly know anyone else in the movie, as the late 1970s is my meat as far as pop culture!

Then I realized that it was filmed in Canada, so most of the actors are Canadians that didn't really crossover to mainstream American moves or TV.

The biggest-name American import was David Wayne, who plays a bookstore owner named Merrivale, who also seems to double as the Ghost of Christmas Past for some reason. He's a solid pro and does a good job.

At that point in time. I was most familiar with David Wayne from his recent roles on the "Dallas" and "Ellery Queen" shows, but probably mostly as the Mad Hatter on a couple of two-part episodes on the "Batman" TV series!

Besides David Wayne and Henry Winkler, the only other actor I know is Dorian Harewood, who gets special billing and appears as a character whose possessions are repossessed by Slade on Christmas Eve, as well as the Ghost of Christmas Future.

Amusingly, the ghost appears in full 1979 mode!

Dorian doesn't get a lot to do here, but he does a good job with what he has to work with. He has a good presence and a great voice, so it's not surprising that he's done a lot of voicework over the years!

As I mentioned, I really don't recognize anyone else in the cast. I can't say that anyone made a particular impression on me one way or the other.

Next, we'll talk about the plot points!

Friday, February 25, 2022

"An American Christmas Carol" (1979) - Part 2


If you got the chance to watch the 1979 TV-movie "An American Christmas Carol," I'm sure you'll agree it's an interesting take!

Let's talk a bit about the star, Henry Winkler as the Scrooge surrogate character, Benedict Slade.

Winkler is definitely best-known for his portrayal of Arthur "Fonzie" Fonzarelli, AKA "The Fonz" on the long-running (1974-1984) TV series "Happy Days."

I was a kid when "Happy Days" premiered and I was as big a fan of the show and Fonzie as every other kid I knew. The whole Fonzie thing was the biggest cultural phenomenon that I personally recall being swept up in.

Like most such things, you really had to be there to appreciate it!

So, this TV-movie came along in 1979, which was right in the middle of the "Happy Days" run, but it was already a couple of years after the show had literally "jumped the shark."

By the time the 1977 shark-jumping episode aired, I had already thought the Fonzie character was too super-human and featured too much on the show.

I liked it better when Fonzie sometimes wore a cloth jacket and was shadier!

That happens sometimes when an intriguing side character becomes the breakout character and sort of moves away from what you liked about the character to begin with.

In any event, I can totally see why Henry Winkler took on this project to expand his acting horizons.

He has some interesting comments in this latter-day clip:


I think he does a good job in the role, not seeming like the Fonz at all, as he disappears into the Slade character.

It's not that jarring in 2022, as he's still around and we're used to seeing him older and in more varied roles.

But what a shock it was in 1979!






Thursday, February 24, 2022

"An American Christmas Carol" (1979) - Part 1



"An American Christmas Carol" (1979)
Director: Eric Till
Surrogate Scrooge: "Benedict Slade" (Henry Winkler)

We were just in 1932 with the song "It's Winter Again" and we're moving just one figurative year ahead with the 1933-set TV-movie "An American Christmas Carol" from the literal year of 1979!

This adaptation of  "A Christmas Carol" transplants the story to Depression-era New Hampshire, but includes most of the traditional plot elements.

It's probably most notable in that the Scrooge character, here named "Benedict Slade," is played by Henry Winkler who was then right in the middle of his run as "The Fonz" on the highly popular "Happy Days" TV-series.

Here are some clips related to the Blu-ray/DVD release from Shout! Factory (some spoilers):





I switched the order a bit so they'd flow chronologically.

You can also watch an official video on YouTube:


If you haven't seen it, take a look and we'll discuss!


Wednesday, February 23, 2022

Happy Birthday!

Don't forget that today is the birthday of Kathleen Harrison!


Happy birthday - in keeping with the situation!

Save me a cup of coffee and slice of pumpkin pie at Farmer Gray's house!

Tuesday, February 22, 2022

Monday, February 21, 2022

Happy President's Day!

Since it's President's Day today, I was wondering who was the U.S president when "A Christmas Carol" was first published in 1843.


The non-obvious answer is John Tyler!

Whoever thinks about John Tyler except as part of "Tippecanoe and Tyler Too!"

Noteworthy is that Tyler was the first vice president to succeed to the presidency upon the death upon the death of the president, which happened when Ol' Tippecanoe (William Henry Harrison) died after just 32 days in office.

I do love that Tyler's detractors referred to him as "His Accidency" back in the day!

I wonder if he ever read "A Christmas Carol" to any of his 15 children?

Sunday, February 20, 2022

I Like It!

 Speaking of 1970's "Scrooge" (which is a musical) here's a fun print:


I'm sure the Ghost of Christmas Present would love one - if he had a wall on which to hang it!

If so, he can buy it here.


Friday, February 18, 2022

Yes, It Is!

 I don't think I've seen a poster with this tagline before:


They're right, though. It is a musical!

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Baby Scrooge?


Here's a short, children's version of "A Christmas Carol" from PinkFong (the folks behind the infamous "Baby Shark" earworm:


Is it wrong that I kind of like it?

Saturday, February 12, 2022

What Was In There?

I don't know much about this snazzy artwork other than it was painted by American artist Douglas Crockwell:




And it shows up on this tin:



It's unclear what came in the tin. Was it cookies? (Yay!) Or was it fruitcake? (Boo!)

Thursday, February 10, 2022

Tuesday, February 8, 2022

Sketchy!

This is cool...

It's a preliminary sketch by Carl Barks for  the 1960 Little Golden Book "Donald Duck and the Christmas Carol":




Here's the finished page:


Carl Barks was the master!


Sunday, February 6, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 4


So, after a reasonably thorough examination of Vanguard Records' adaptation of "A Christmas Carol" from 1958, the question is how does it rate?

I try to look at such questions from a few different perspectives.

First, how does it work strictly from an adaptational standpoint? Does it capture the flavor of the source material? Can you write a book report from it?

I think it does a pretty good job, but it has too many omissions of important events, especially considering it suns for more than 50 minutes.

The past sequence leaves out young boy Scrooge at school and apprentice Scrooge at Fezziwig's, which are vitally important as these sequences teach Scrooge some valuable lessons. And if this version was to be your introduction to the story, you'd be unaware of some iconic scenes. and wouldn't get a good grade on your book report!

I don't really mind all that much that the end sequence is changed a bit, as that happens in a number of versions, but I don't think it's handled well.

So, this adaptation does not meet the book report test! 

This leads to the next question, which is if you're already familiar with the story and don't mind a few changes, is it entertaining to listen to?

I think it is, as it's well-produced and well-acted. I don't think, however that it has any extra oomph to set it apart from the many other versions, especially those with a "star" Scrooge like Lionel Barrymore, Ronald Colman or Lionel Barrymore.

And I always try to think of how an adaptation compares to others from its general time period.

There were a few albums from around the same time as this one, although this is ahead of the crowd, having been released in 1958.

Right away, I think this one is better than the Frank Pettingell version that followed in 1959, but not as good as the Ralph Richardson version from 1960.

The fair fight is between this one and the Bernard Miles version from 1960. This one works better as an adaptation, but the Miles version offers a more varied listening experience.

Bottom line is that I find this recording interesting and worth a listen, but it's not definiivte.

Saturday, February 5, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 3


Now it's time for the inevitable breakdown of the script for Vanguard Records' audio dramatization of "A Christmas Carol" from 1958!

The whole shebang runs a little less than an hour, so there's plenty of time to cover all the major plot points, but as with many versions, it has many curious omissions.

The record starts off with a prologue by Irish radio commentator Ronnie Walsh to set the mood. It doesn't use anything from the original text, but that's OK.

He does say that the story takes place in 1842, so that would be a year before the book was published.

The first scene in Scrooge's office is pretty much as expected, with visits from Fred and, in this case, one charity collector.

Scrooge actually calls Fred by his name here, not just "Nephew," but the bigger change is that the portly gentleman identifies himself as Mr. Goodman, an importer of teas. This makes him a fellow businessman and not a full-time charity collector.

Despite these changes, the script uses a lot of the familiar dialogue from the book, which is never a bad thing!

The biggest difference overall in this first scene is that Scrooge tells Bob Cratchit that he must report to the office on Christmas morning at 9:00 to work for a couple of hours, rather than giving him the whole day off.

Scrooge also instructs Bob to put his gruel on the fire and put his slippers there to warm, which implies that Scrooge's office and living space are in the same building. So, apparently Scrooge is going back there after his dinner and the knocker is on the office door.

Whatever the case, Marley's Ghost arrives and has the usual banter with Scrooge.

By this point, Scrooge is describing a lot of the action as it's happening, putting me in mind of Basil Rathbone's recording from 1942.

The Ghost of Christmas past comes along and only has one vision for Scrooge, which is the breakup scene with his former fiancée, who is named Emma here.


Emma seems like a suitable name to me, with its echoes of Jane Austen and all, but I always wonder why various versions pick the names they add/or change.

As I mentioned, this is the only scene from the past that Scrooge is shown. The spirit does say, "One shadow more," but Scrooge refuses to see it and the spirit does not compel him to see Belle/Emma with her family as in the book.


As far as that goes, it reminds me quite a bit of a similar scene in "Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol," but this record predates the TV special by four years and I wouldn't imagine it was an influence on it.

Unique to the record and very intriguing is that Scrooge asks the spirit if she will return and she answers affirmatively, indicating she will return on the next night.

Indeed, when the next spirit appears, she is also voiced by Siobhan McKenna and Scrooge recognizes her but notes that she now wears a wreath of holly.

So, it's apparently the same spirit now representing the present, although the spirit does not identify herself as the Ghost of Christmas Present (shades of the George C. Scott version!). She does later say she's the "Spirit of Christmas," however.

This makes the introductory exchange between Scrooge and the spirit somewhat awkward, as dialogue is lifted from the book to include the spirit asking Scrooge if he's seen the like of her before, to which Scrooge says he has not. But, he did - last night!

I realize that they want to make as much use of Ms. McKenna as they can, but the script could have used a bit of tweaking.

As in the past, there's only one scene for Scrooge to see and it's the Cratchit family's Christmas dinner.

This is often a highlight of many versions and it's well represented here, taking up about a quarter of the whole thing.

We even get to hear Tiny Tim's song, which in this adaptation is "The First Noël." 


Tiny Tim's delivery puts me in mind of the way the kids sang "The First Noël" in the 1965 Davey & Goliath special "Christmas Lost and Found" (which is awesome!), but that's probably just me!

One thing to note is that Scrooge has apparently met Bob's family before as he knows about Tiny Tim and remarks that Peter has grown since the last time he saw him.

I do realize that a lot of Scrooge's dialogue is for expository purposes, but I think that any adaptation that shows that Scrooge was already aware of Tiny Tim's condition loses a bit of impact, as Scrooge should already have been a least bit somewhat concerned instead of only becoming concerned when seeing this vision.

Oh, and I think Mrs. Cratchit calls the usually unnamed Cratchit son "Tom" but does not say the name of the other, non-Martha, non-Belinda daughter!

Scrooge does see Ignorance and Want before this spirit departs.

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come appears and calls out "Ebenezer Scrooge!" twice before clamming up and not saying anything else.

I'm thinking they had her call out to Scrooge just so they could say that Siobhan McKenna played all three spirits, but it strikes me as awkward that this spirit refuses to answer Scrooge's questions when it has been established that she/it can talk!

The spirit brings Scrooge directly to the establishment of old Joe and Scrooge actually knows who Joe is! Again, I realize that it's due to Scrooge needing to speak a lot of expository dialogue, but it's interesting.

Odder still is that only the charwoman enters Joe's shop. She calls herself Mrs. Dilber, which we know is the name of the laundress, but whatever. That's not the odd part!

The odd part is that she brings three different bundles, the other two (in addition to her usual bed curtains and whatnot) being the bundles usually brought by the laundress and the undertaker's man. Joe opens each bundle separately and gives an accounting of each one separately, using dialogue from the book.

I don't know why it's done that way instead of having a couple of the actors voice the laundress and undertaker's man, as it's easy enough for voice actors to double up.

Scrooge then says that he wants to see some emotion caused by his death, then some tenderness connected with a death, as he does in the book, but if the spirit does show him these things, we do not partake in them!

We just hear some eerie music and Scrooge saying he has leaned his lesson and doesn't need to see anything else. But the spirit brings Scrooge to a churchyard anyway.

There he sees Tiny Tim's grave as well as his own and notes that Tim's is well cared for and his own is not.

So, Scrooge wakes up on Christmas morning and jumps around and all and engages the boy outside the window to buy the prize turkey and deliver it anonymously to Bob Cratchit and says he'll get in touch with Mr. Goodman to make a charitable donation.

Despite some of the changes that have led to a bit of awkwardness, the script so far has been pretty faithful to the book. But from this point on, things get very clunky!

The problem is that Scrooge had told Bob Cratchit that he needed to work on Christmas morning. So, the business of Scrooge arriving at the office ahead of Bob in order to surprise him takes placed on Christmas morning, rather than the day after.

Usually Bob's excuse for being late is that he was "making rather merry," which is fun. But here he says he was up late helping Mrs. Cratchit prepare the Christmas dinner, which just seems lame.

But Scrooge raises Bob's salary and says he will help his struggling family and that they'll discuss it that afternoon over a Christmas bowl of smoking bishop and all, just like in the book, but that just doesn't make sense that he'd meet with Bob on Christmas afternoon, pulling him away from his family.

So, Scrooge sends Bob home and says he'll see him later in the day.

The tone of the whole thing changes now as the narrator reappears with some jaunty music to tell us the scene is now the Cratchit house after dinner (presumably having eaten the prize turkey) and we hear a little speech from Bob about the new year. Then the narrator (and music) comes back to tell us that Fred and his "winsome wife" have dropped in.

It strikes me as odd to have the narrator return suddenly after having only given the prologue before. Why didn't we have him set some other scenes instead of having Scrooge spout so much expository dialogue?

And what makes Bob and Fred such good friends? It's not particularly established that they know each other well, such as was the case in the 1938 MGM movie version.

Things get so incredibly awkward when Scrooge shows up at the Cratchit house and everyone seems surprised to see him, including Bob. And Bob then acts surprised when Scrooge says he help his family.

Now, keep in mind that Scrooge had already met with Bob earlier that day and raised his salary and said he see him later. Wouldn't Bob had told his family this good news when he got home? You'd think he would mention Scrooge was different (and would be dropping by)! He would at least have to explain why he came right back home rather than needing to work for a couple of hours.

Scrooge also namedrops Fezziwig, saying he knew how to celebrate Christmas, but within the confines of this record, we have no idea who Fezziwig is.

When Bob offers Scrooge "a glass," Scrooge declines, saying he's had enough of spirits to last a lifetime, which is a good line, but everyone laughs uproariously as if they got the joke, but they should not have any idea what he's talking about.

This whole final scene is just very strange and not particularly well-handled.

Scrooge ends the record by using more text from the book and suddenly it's done. Totally cold ending with no music or anything. I think the narrator should have come back with the jaunty music to close it out to give it a little more balance.

OK, so what's the final verdict?

Friday, February 4, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 2



If you got the chance to listen to the 1958 dramatization of "A Christmas Carol" from Vanguard Records, I'm sure you found it interesting.

Before discussing it, just a few words about the cast, which consisted of members of the Dublin Theatre, as per the album cover.



The most prominent name is Irish actress Siobhan McKenna, who portrays the three Christmas spirits and gets her picture on the cover!

I'm reasonably familiar with her, as she was in a few movies, most notably 1965's "Dr. Zhivago" and 1961's "King of Kings," in which she played Mary. She was mainly a stage actress, however, and well-known as such in 1958.

I think she does a good job on the album, but isn't really used that much.




Scrooge is played by Anew McMaster, who was almost exclusively a stage actor, appearing in only one small, un-billed part in one movie, 1960's "Sword of Sherwood Forest," a fun flick featuring Richard Greene's Robin Hood vs. Peter Cushing's Sheriff of Nottingham!

I do think McMaster is a slight bit hammy as Scrooge, perhaps a result of his normally working on the stage, but he does the heavy lifting here and is effective.

I understand that although he styled himself as Irish native, he was actually born in England with the first name of Andrew!



The only other actor from the album that I recognize is Milo O'Shea, who plays old Joe. He wasn't too well-known in 1958, but had a long career lasting into the 2000s in which he popped up in a lot of movies as well as TV dramas and sitcoms.

He had a particularly interesting year in 1968 with featured roles in the movies "Romeo and Juliet" and "Barbarella" (he was Durand-Durand)!

I think its a good cast that performs well!

Next: What kind of a script did that cast get to perform?

Thursday, February 3, 2022

"A Christmas Carol" - Vanguard Records (1958) - Part 1



"A Christmas Carol" (1958)
Vanguard Records
Scrooge: Anew McMaster

It seems like forever since I've reviewed a straight-up adaptation of "A Christmas Carol," so here we go with this audio dramatization from Vanguard Records in 1958, featuring Siobhan McKenna with Anew McMaster as Scrooge.

Give it a listen:




Next: A look at the cast...

Tuesday, February 1, 2022

Silhouettes!

 This edition from Alma Classics has an interesting cover:


Those particular silhouettes wouldn't be in the same frame at the same time, but whatever!