Saturday, November 16, 2019

Scrooge (1935) - Part 1



Scrooge (1935)
Director: Henry Edwards
Scrooge: Seymour Hicks

Now we'll take a look at another full-length movie adaptation: "Scrooge," a 1935 British production starring Sir Seymour Hicks.

This is a version I had heard about way back in the pre-internet days when hearing about such things was much harder! I knew this was older than the 1938 MGM version and that Sir Seymour Hicks was renowned for his portrayal of Scrooge, but had never seen it on TV.

Then in the mid-1980s, home video came along and all sorts of public domain movies such as this became available. In horrible umpteenth generation copies, but you could see stuff you had never seen before.

When I finally got my mitts on this thing, I felt like I was holding the Rosetta Stone - the first full-length talking version of "A Christmas Carol."

Side note: It's interesting that this movie and its fellow British theatrical versions from 1951 and 1970 were all titled "Scrooge" rather than "A Christmas Carol." Coincidence? Who knows?



Anyway, there are a couple of different cuts of this film, one running about an hour and the other about 17 minutes longer than that. I don't know why there are two versions, but they have different credits. The short cut has just static title cards with very brief credits, whereas the long cut has a hand opening a book of "A Christmas Carol," then turning the pages to reveal longer credits, winding up at the preface. Interestingly, the short version bills Philip Frost (as Tiny Tim) much higher.

The first copy of this film that I had on VHS was a washed out short version. Once DVDs came out, I got a better transfer of the longer version. Nowadays because it's in the public domain, all sorts of videos of varying quality pop up all over the place. There's even a colorized version!

I don't know if the original elements still exist, so we have to take what we can get, but I'd love to see a copy that's as clean as that 1938 MGM version. Only three years passed in between them, but it seems like light years.

In any event, I really like this version. It has tons of atmosphere and a few touches not commonly seen. And Sir Seymour Hicks is certainly a great Scrooge. I can see it being a tough watch for the average modern viewer, however, as the image and sound are a little rough and it's definitely dated without much in the way of special effects and heavy use of background music.

But, if you already like movies from the '30s and Scrooge, this is a good one!

Friday, November 15, 2019

"Ebenezer Scrooge" (1953)




"Ebenezer Scrooge" (1953)
Song by Danny DiMinno, Rick French, Dick Stutz

While discussing the merits of the songs from "Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol" and the 1970 "Scrooge," my mind naturally wandered to songs about Scrooge in general.

Not that there are a ton, but there is this cute novelty number from the 1953 holiday season.

Context, please! 1953 is in that nether region of popular music that stretches from the mid/late 1940s to the early/mid 1950s, after the big band era and before the rock & roll boom. Singers like Perry Como and Patti Page ruled the charts.

It was also the heyday of novelty Christmas songs with "I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus" by Jimmy Boyd having topped the charts the previous holiday season. 1953 saw, among others, Gayla Peevey's "I Want a Hippopotamus for Christmas," which gives an idea of what was going on then!

Since everyone was looking for the next big Christmas song, why not try making Ebenezer Scrooge into a wacky novelty character a la "Frosty the Snowman" and "Suzy Snowflake," both recent hits?

Once you had the song, you needed to get it recorded. So, they lined up Teresa Brewer and Eddy Howard, both popular recording artists of the time.

"Cash Box" likes it!


Eddy Howard was a bandleader, but his popularity actually soared around the unofficial end of the big band era, with his 1946 smash "To Each His Own." He maintained his popularity through the early 1950s, long after most bandleaders, because as a vocalist (and a really good one), he fit in with the other popular singers. He and his band could handle all sorts of material, so they do a good job with this tune. He charted over 40 Billboard chart hits, up through 1955, so no slouch!



You can hear his version below:



Teresa Brewer was part of the new wave of singers, having burst on the scene as a 19-year old with her huge hit "Music! Music! Music!" in 1950. She could sing in a  range of styles as well, but she could really deliver a novelty song, so this little ditty is totally in her wheelhouse. She was at her peak in 1953, having had two major hits, "Til I Waltz Again With You" and "Ricochet" earlier in the year.


Here's her take:


And dig that crazy artwork:



Love it!

The song itself is about the shortest condensation of "A Christmas Carol" you'll ever hear, but it does get in a couple of story elements.



Eartha Kitt "won" the 1953 holiday season with "Santa Baby":



So, "Ebenezer Scrooge" is a fun little relic of Christmas Past!

But, you know, "Tennessee Wig-Walk" is also pretty snappy:



Fun!

Thursday, November 14, 2019

Mister Magoo vs. Scrooge



I had mentioned that my natural comparison of "Scrooge," the 1971 musical adaptation, is "Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol," which I think is generally considered the best musical version, cartoon or not.

My inclination is that "Magoo" is better song-wise, but is that really the case? I thought a song by song comparison would tell the tale. The funny thing with that, though, is that there really isn't a song from one that has an exact counterpart in the other.

But let's do it anyway!

"Magoo" has six original songs versus twelve for "Scrooge." Makes sense, as "Scrooge" is just about twice as long.

The first song from "Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol" after the credits is "It's Great to Be Back on Broadway." There's no Broadway element to "Scrooge," but it does have "A Christmas Carol," which would be the title song, if that were the title! That also pops up here and there throughout the film. Both of these songs serve their purpose, but Magoo's is a blast!

The next song from "Scrooge" is "Christmas Children," sung by Bob Cratchit and two of his kids. The closest comparison in "Magoo" would be "The Lord's Bright Blessing," as that Bob sings it with his family. Somewhat similar themes. I like both a lot.

Each Scrooge gets a song to help establish their characters. Quincy Magoo sings "Ringle, Ringle" and Albert Finney sort-of sings "I Hate People." The focus of each is different, however, as Magoo's song shows that he loves money but doesn't give his opinion about people. Both songs work, but Magoo's is more fun, plus we get Cratchit squawking about being cold!

"Scrooge" then has "Father Christmas" sung by those pesky urchins, "See the Phantoms" from Marley's Ghost" and "December the 25th" with the Fezziwigs before we get to the next comp from "Magoo." Good songs, especially "December the 25th," which is catchy.

Meanwhile, "Magoo" has "Alone in the World," as sung by boy Scrooge as a duet with old Scrooge. Despite the extra songs in "Scrooge," none of them deal with lonely, young Scrooge. This one from "Magoo" has a depth of emotion that none of the "Scrooge" songs have.

The next songs that sort of line up are Belle/Isabel's from Christmas past. I think this is the most natural comparison of any of the songs, as the same basic character sings each, but the two are quite different. Isabel's song, "Happiness" is, naturally, about how happy she is, whereas Belle's, "Winter Was Warm," is about how happy she was. I definitely give the nod to Belle's song, with its haunting melody.

Albert Finney also has "You... You" in the Christmas past sequence. This is actually more in line with "Winter Was Warm," and has a pretty haunting melody of its own.

"Scrooge" has the titular fellow singing "I Like Life" with the Ghost of Christmas Present and "The Beautiful Day" sung by Tiny Tim in the Christmas present section. "Magoo" doesn't have comparable songs. Its big number during the present is "The Lord's Bright Blessing" as mentioned earlier, but it comes at a different time in the show, because the present comes first there!

The future sequence of each has a big number. I'm on record for not liking "We're Despicable" (except for the cool subtitle "The Plunderers' March") from "Magoo," whereas "Scrooge" has the show-stopping "Thank You Very Much." So, "Scrooge" wins the future handily, but Magoo reprising "All Alone in the World" saves that future from being a a total shambles!

We get one more original song from "Scrooge" when Albert Finney ummm sings "I'll Begin Again," then reprises of "I Like Life," "Father Christmas," and "Thank You Very Much" for the big finale. These songs now have revised lyrics to make them un-ironic!

"Magoo" gets reprises of "Ringle, Ringle" and "The Lord's Bright Blessing" with revised lyrics to suit its own happy ending.

All in all, I still think that "Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol" has superior songs, but "Scrooge" has a solid score that can go to-to-toe!

Interestingly, even in these days of everything seeming to be available with a couple of clicks, these two soundtracks are both hard to find.

"Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol" had a download only version at one point, but never an official release on a physical medium.

"Scrooge" did have a soundtrack album on vinyl back in the day, but was never reissued on CD or digitally, ostensibly due to legal issues.

Go figure!

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Scrooge (1970) - Part 3


Now we've come to the part where we look at the plot points that are added and omitted from the 1970 musical "Scrooge" and some of those oddities that always seem to show up. This a pretty faithful adaptation, but it naturally takes a few liberties...

I think it's interesting that in this version we don't hear anything of Marley or the fact that he died seven years previously until about 15 minutes in. There's no exposition at all at the beginning (The first words of the book are: "Marley was dead to begin with.") and the gentlemen soliciting for charity meet Scrooge when he's coming out of his office (which is when we hear that Marley was dead) after Bob Cratchit had already left and had time to do his shopping and return home.



The scene where Bob buys the provisons for Christmas dinner with Tiny Tim and Kathy is fun and they all get to sing. This reminds me of a similar scene, minus the kids and song, in the 1938 version. In this film, he buys the Christmas pudding rather than Mrs. Cratchit nervously making it herself.

I do like when the guy dressed as Father Christmas gives Bob five mystery presents, rather than four, because Bob has five children. I do wonder what was in those packages, but we never find out!

We also have an added scene of Scrooge going around trying (in vain) to collect some of the debts owed to him. This gives him a chance to sing about hating people and be taunted in song by a group of street urchins.



I agree with Scrooge that those kids are annoying, especially the one who looks like Mikey from the ubiquitous Life Cereal commercial of around that time!

When Scrooge gets home, he sees a hearse on his staircase, a little thing from the book that's not often shown. Here the driver talks to him, which is pretty creepy.



Extremely creepy is when Marley's Ghost takes Scrooge flying among his fellow phantoms!

Marley's Ghost explains that the three other spirits will all visit Scrooge that same night, which is a pretty common change from the book's having them come on three successive nights.

As mentioned before, the Ghost of Christmas Past is an elderly woman who doesn't look like a ghost.



An odd bit when they go back to Scrooge's school is that when he sees the other children wearing costumes and riding on wagons, he points out his sister Fan! What was Fan doing at the school rather than being at home with their father (and possibly mother)? And why did Scrooge say he could never join the Christmas parties? Wouldn't Fan have wanted him with her? We do get older Fan later in her usual scene where she comes to take Ebenezer home.



We get a big musical number at Fezziwig's party and are introduced to Isabel, Fezziwig's daughter and Scrooge's fiancee. We get an extended montage of Ebenezer and Isabel doing fun things. It seems to me that young Scrooge is not smiling all that much. Is it to show that he was already becoming more attached to money than pleasure?

Whatever the case, we do get the breakup scene, but we don't see Isabel later happily married.

The change from the book of having Isabel (or Belle) being at Fezziwig's party is certainly not uncommon. She's not always identified as his daughter, however.



Back in the present, the ghost and Scrooge drink the milk of human kindness and have another musical number. Scrooge tells the ghost that it's 1860, which seems random, but there it is.



When they go to Bob Cratchit's house, for whatever reason they stay outside and look in the window. They should be able to go inside, as the ghost says the Cratchits cannot see them. Odder still is that they wipe the windows to see better. They shouldn't be able to do that, right? What if one of the Cratchits looked over and saw the window seemingly wiping itself!

Bob and his wife have a longer argument than usual over the toast to Scrooge, with Bob defending him and "Ethel" getting some extra digs in. As part of this, she mentions that Bob has worked for Scrooge for eight years, so he apparently worked with Marley for a year too. At least this shows to Scrooge how kindhearted and loyal Bob really is.

Tiny Tim gets to sing a song, which he does in the book, but this is one written for the movie. I understand that Dickens scholars cannot determine exactly what song Tiny Tim sang in the book anyway! Bob says that Tim is seven, by the way, another oddly specific detail.



Next they go to Scrooge's nephew's house and actually make it inside! This is where we hear the nephew addressed as "Harry." That is so weird to me! Also, the nephew seems snarkier than usual when talking about his uncle, insulting him as opposed to comically pointing out his bad attitude about Christmas.

Scrooge also says his nephew has "always been stupid" when the guests are playing a game. The whole nephew business is pretty much a shambles!

The "Minister's Cat" game they play, however, does seem fun! Scrooge has a blast playing along.

No further celebrations are shown and no Ignorance and Want, by the way.

Now, the future is where things get a bit different. It starts with the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come appearing Scrooge's room. Usually he meets him outside immediately after the Ghost of Christmas Present disappears.



What follows is interesting in that Scrooge does not have any idea that he's dead. Everybody is celebrating his death, but Scrooge thinks he did something nice for them (other than dying) and joins in! Usually Scrooge sees visions of someone being dead and his stuff being sold and no one feeling sympathy, slowly catching on that he's the unfortunate deceased party. Here he knows he's the one they're talking about, but never catches on that his death is causing the celebration.



While singing and dancing along, the crowd leaves him outside Bob Cratchit's house, where we figure that Tiny Tim no longer resides. Scrooge asks where he is and we're brought to a cemetery where Bob is kneeling at a small grave.

This seems to imply that Scrooge and Tiny Tim died at about the same time, as this is all one long sequence.



Then things get really wacky when Scrooge falls into his own grave and winds up in that "extremity" (to use the words of Dickens) where the likes of him go. He meets a very chipper Marley down there who shows Scrooge the frigid office where he'll be Lucifer's clerk and presents him with a ginormous chain carried by a bunch of oddly-attired assistant devils.

It's a strange sequence. I'm not crazy about it and never really squawked when it was cut out of broadcast airings over the years.

I do find Marley amusing, however, and liked that he said Scrooge was as dead as a coffin nail, in a shout out to the original text!



When Scrooge is back in his bedroom, he's ready for action. He buys all sorts of stuff to bring to the Cratchit family including a Father Christmas outfit. He meets everyone he was mean to at the beginning, including "Harry," with whom he promises to have Christmas lunch (sharp at 3:00, per the wife), and joins in a now-legit celebratory production number!

I do like how he proudly tells the door knocker that he's having dinner with his family.

I think this a great version that holds up well today! What do you think?



Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Scrooge (1970) - Part 2



Let's take a look at the cast and characters in this adaptation...



Leading the way is Albert Finney as Scrooge. I think he gives a great interpretation. What he conveys better than perhaps anybody else is the miserliness. A lot of times Scrooge is portrayed as a coldhearted business man, but here he really seems like an eccentric old miser. His clothes and office and home seem shabby because he just does not want to spend any money at all. He looks like he even cuts his own hair!

Scrooge's scenes after he reformation would seem over the top, but they're convincing because he is just a bit crazy anyway!

The Scrooge makeup does a good job of making the 30-something Finney into a recognizably Scrooge-looking type. An advantage this version has over almost any other is that it has an extremely convincing young Scrooge, as that's Albert Finney without the old age makeup.



I really like the younger take on Bob Cratchit here. He's played by  David Collings,who gives the role a youthful exuberance we don't normally get. He has a lot of fun with his kids, who are all younger than usual in this version as well. He's also very loyal to Scrooge, as seen in the somewhat longer than usual "toast" scene. Mrs. Cratchit (Bob calls her "Ethel" just once, I think) seems a bit old for Bob, but maybe it's just me.



Tiny Tim is pretty good. As with most screen Tims, he doesn't necessarily look like he's deathly ill, but whatever. The actor, Richard Beaumont, is not annoying at all, and does a good job with his little solo song.

There are five Cratchit kids altogether, three girls and two boys. There doesn't appear to be a Martha, as Bob would be too young to have  a daughter who's a milliner's apprentice. One of the daughters is named Kathy (played by Karen Scargill) and kind of partners with Tiny Tim. She's cute in an also non-annoying way. We don't know if the other girl is Belinda or if the non-Tim boy is Peter.



I don't care for Scrooge's nephew here. First problem is that he's inexplicably called "Harry." Huh? That just seems weird. Plus, I think the actor, Michael Medwin, is too old for the part. If my math is right, he was 47 at the time and does not look like I think Scrooge's young newlywed nephew should look. A quick bit of research shows he was Albert Finney's producing partner. Aha!



Marley's Ghost on the other hand, is a blast. The great Alec Guinness gives an offbeat characterization, complete with a crazy little walk. He gets an unusual second scene late in the movie and makes the most of it. His makeup, which makes gives him a monochromatic bluish gray tint, is really good.



Edith Evans plays the Ghost of Christmas Past here. She's not the typical ghost, but they lampshade it right away. Scrooge says she doesn't look like a ghost, and she says, "Thank you." She's pretty old, but still has presence. She's got some snappy one-liners at Scrooge's expense.



The Ghost of Christmas Present, played by Kenneth More, has a classic look and gives an appropriately boisterous performance. He gets in some pretty good zingers too.



The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come looks about how you'd expect, except that it reveals a crazy Skeletor face at the end of its scene. This ghost is played by Paddy Stone, who was the choreographer for the film. Some of the scenes have a lot of complicated choreography going on, so he certainly earned the right to get this part!

Scrooge's former fiance is named Isabel in this version and is Fezziwig's daugther. As such, she gets a fair amount of screen-time. Suzanne Neve does a good job in the role and handles her featured song well. Her parents, played by Laurence Naismith and Kay Walsh, also do a good job with their big number.

A sequence at the beginning of the film shows Scrooge going around trying to collect debts, so we get a few incidental characters unique to this adaptation. Showiest among the is Tom Jenkins, the soup vendor, as played by Anton Rodgers, who leads the showstopping "Thank You Very Much" number(s).

Except for Albert Finney and Alec Guinness, I'm not really familiar with any of the actors (1970s British films are not my spec-i-al-ity), but that works as there's nothing to distract me from the characters they're playing.

And Finney and Guinness are great, so no problem there!

Monday, November 11, 2019

Scrooge (1970) - Part 1




Scrooge (1970)
Director: Ronald Neame
Scrooge: Albert Finney

OK, now we're moving on to something that deserves more virtual ink than those last couple of things: the big budget musical "Scrooge" from 1970 starring Albert Finney.

Here's a trailer, which I think is more dated than the movie itself:



Full disclosure: This was the first adaptation I remember seeing way back in the day. I thought it was great and even had the soundtrack album, which I played all the time!

Nostalgia aside, does it hold up? Of course I'm going to say yes!

The first thing you need for a successful adaptation is a Scrooge who can really carry the show. I think Albert Finney does a great job in the role. He seems to really throw himself into the role and has an awesome "look" as Scrooge.

With a musical that's more of a drama than a comedy, you want songs that fit in naturally, rather than having the story come to a stop, have a big number, the more story, etc. I think they succeed here.

The first thing I think to compare this adaptation to is "Mister Magoo's Christmas Carol," and the songs here probably don't reach that high standard, but they work as part of the whole.

A little context shows why this got green-lighted back in 1970 or so. "Oliver!" (1968) had just won a bunch of Oscars, including Best Picture. When would the time be better for another musical adaptation of a Dickens work, and his most popular at that? Throw in the breakout star of another Oscar winning British period piece, "Tom Jones" (1963), and you're onto something!

The songs and screenplay are by Leslie Bricusse, who was on an interesting run of musical adaptations. He had recently worked on "Doctor Doolittle" (1967) and "Lost Horizon" (1969) and had "Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory" (1971) the next year.

So, with these elements in place, what did we wind up with?

Sunday, November 10, 2019

The Christmas Carol (1949) - Part 3



OK, now all we have to do is finish nitpicking this 1949 adaptation and we can send it back to well-deserved obscurity!

Scrooge is played here by Taylor Holmes, who was 71 at the time, so definitely of the old melodramatic school of acting. Subtle, he is not! He seems like he thinks he's on stage or perhaps in a silent movie.

He's certainly not silent, though, and affects a weird voice for Scrooge. At times I thought he was going for a Lionel Barrymore vibe, but it's inconsistent.

I feel like I should be more familiar with Taylor Holmes than I am, but I can't really place him. He has small roles in movies that I've seen, but I don't remember him. He was in a pretty good run of Fox movies right before this, including three outstanding 1947 releases: "Boomerang," "Nightmare Alley" and "Kiss of Death." I'll have to keep an eye out for him the next time I watch any of those.

Tiny Tim is played by Bobby Hyatt, who actually had a number of roles as a child actor, of this was not the first. You wouldn't know it, though, as he's so amateurish here. He seems very proud that he remembered his one line: "God bless us everyone." (He does yell, "Mr. Scrooge!" later.)

The other actors don't add much, but of note is that one of the Cratchit daughters (dubbed Missie here) is played by 9-year old Jill Oppenheim, who grew up to find a certain celebrity status as Jill St. John!



Marley's ghost makes an interesting entrance. It seems to be a special effect in which a door is superimposed over paper or cardboard through which he bursts like the Kool Aid Man! Marley's ghost seems a bit confused and Scrooge doesn't seem all that scared, so the whole scene is strange.



Strange also are the other three ghosts who are costumed none too convincingly. The Ghost of Christmas Present in particular is odd. He strikes a pose like a super-hero and yells his lines!

In any event, time is of the element here, so we get short sequences with the ghosts.

The past only has young, lonely Ebenezer. No Fan, Fezziwig or Belle. The ghost does mention that Scrooge did have a fiancee, which he interestingly says was 40 years ago. Most ghosts aren't so specific. He also says that Ebenezer is lonely because he shunned his playmates, as opposed to being dumped off at school by his father.

In the present we only get the Cratchits' Christmas dinner, with the usual shenanigans.

The future actually has the most scenes, including Tiny Tim's death, the other businessmen talking and Scrooge's name rather unconvincingly superimposed on a tombstone.

Back on Christmas Day in the present, Scrooge starts jumping and laughing like a nut. Anybody would have thought he actually had gone mad!

Scrooge brings Fred and his wife to Bob Cratchit's house, but they enter first to set up Scrooge surprising the family with the turkey and other gifts. That's actually pretty fun.

Interestingly, Scrooge tells Tiny Tim that he met a surgeon friend (Wait - Scrooge has friends?) in church and that surgeon will help Tiny Tim. That's when Tim delivers his other line.

Cue the happy ending, cut back to Vincent Price quoting Tiny Tim and we're done. Well after some more really slow rolling credits...

Onward and upward!